Go 1.23 adds two new events to QUICConns: QUICStoreSessionEvent and
QUICResumeSessionEvent. We added a QUICConfig.EnableStoreSessionEvent
flag to control whether the store-session event is provided or not,
because receiving this event requires additional action from the caller:
the session must be explicitly stored with QUICConn.StoreSession.
We did not add a control for whether the resume-session event is
provided, because this event requires no action and the caller is
expected to ignore unknown events.
However, we never documented the expectation that callers ignore
unknown events, and quic-go produces an error when receiving an
unexpected event. So change the EnableStoreSessionEvent flag to
apply to both new events.
Fixes#68124
For #63691
Change-Id: I84af487e52b3815f7b648e09884608f8915cd645
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/594475
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Just like for tls.Config.GetCertificate the http.Server.ServeTLS method
should be checking tls.Config.GetConfigForClient before trying top open
the specified certFile/keyFile.
This was previously fixed for crypto/tls when using tls.Listen in
CL205059, but the same change for net/http was missed. I've added a
comment src/crypto/tls/tls.go in the relevant section in the hope that
any future changes of a similar nature consider will consider updating
net/http as needed as well.
Change-Id: I312303bc497d92aa2f4627fe2620c70779cbcc99
GitHub-Last-Rev: 6ed29a9
GitHub-Pull-Request: #66795
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/578396
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Add linknames for most modules with ≥50 dependents.
Add linknames for a few other modules that we know
are important but are below 50.
Remove linknames from badlinkname.go that do not merit
inclusion (very small number of dependents).
We can add them back later if the need arises.
Fixes#67401. (For now.)
Change-Id: I1e49fec0292265256044d64b1841d366c4106002
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/587756
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Bypass: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This CL adds a (very opinionated) client-side ECH implementation.
In particular, if a user configures a ECHConfigList, by setting the
Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList, but we determine that none of
the configs are appropriate, we will not fallback to plaintext SNI, and
will instead return an error. It is then up to the user to decide if
they wish to fallback to plaintext themselves (by removing the config
list).
Additionally if Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList is provided, we
will not offer TLS support lower than 1.3, since negotiating any other
version, while offering ECH, is a hard error anyway. Similarly, if a
user wishes to fallback to plaintext SNI by using 1.2, they may do so
by removing the config list.
With regard to PSK GREASE, we match the boringssl behavior, which does
not include PSK identities/binders in the outer hello when doing ECH.
If the server rejects ECH, we will return a ECHRejectionError error,
which, if provided by the server, will contain a ECHConfigList in the
RetryConfigList field containing configs that should be used if the user
wishes to retry. It is up to the user to replace their existing
Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList with the retry config list.
Fixes#63369
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: I9bc373c044064221a647a388ac61624efd6bbdbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/578575
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
I initially thought the logic was broken, but writing the test I
realized it was actually very clever (derogative). It was relying on the
outer loop continuing after a supported match without a key share,
allowing a later key share to override it (but not a later supported
match because of the "if selectedGroup != 0 { continue }").
Replaced the clever loop with two hopefully more understandable loops,
and added a test (which was already passing).
We were however not checking that the selected group is in the supported
list if we found it in key shares first. (This was only a MAY.) Fixed.
Fixes#65686
Change-Id: I09ea44f90167ffa36809deb78255ed039a217b6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586655
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
CL 585358 adds restrictions to disallow pull-only linknames
(currently off by default). Currently, there are quite some pull-
only linknames in user code in the wild. In order not to break
those, we add push linknames to allow them to be pulled. This CL
includes linknames found in a large code corpus (thanks Matthew
Dempsky and Michael Pratt for the analysis!), that are not
currently linknamed.
Updates #67401.
Change-Id: I32f5fc0c7a6abbd7a11359a025cfa2bf458fe767
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586137
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The check for fragmentary post-handshake messages in QUICConn.HandleData
was reversed, resulting in a potential panic when HandleData receives
a partial message.
In addition, HandleData wasn't checking the size of buffered
post-handshake messages. Produce an error when a post-handshake
message is larger than maxHandshake.
TestQUICConnectionState was using an onHandleCryptoData hook
in runTestQUICConnection that was never being called.
(I think it was inadvertently removed at some point while
the CL was in review.) Fix this test while making the hook
more general.
Fixes#62266
Change-Id: I210b70634e50beb456ab3977eb11272b8724c241
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/522595
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Extremely large RSA keys in certificate chains can cause a client/server
to expend significant CPU time verifying signatures. Limit this by
restricting the size of RSA keys transmitted during handshakes to <=
8192 bits.
Based on a survey of publicly trusted RSA keys, there are currently only
three certificates in circulation with keys larger than this, and all
three appear to be test certificates that are not actively deployed. It
is possible there are larger keys in use in private PKIs, but we target
the web PKI, so causing breakage here in the interests of increasing the
default safety of users of crypto/tls seems reasonable.
Thanks to Mateusz Poliwczak for reporting this issue.
Fixes#61460
Fixes CVE-2023-29409
Change-Id: Ie35038515a649199a36a12fc2c5df3af855dca6c
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1912161
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/515257
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
A reference to a function in a "var _ = ..." init-time
initialization keeps the symbol live. Move references to
Config.EncryptTicket and Config.DecryptTicket into tests.
These references increase the size of an unused import of
crypto/tls by about 1MiB.
Change-Id: I6d62a6dcbd73e22972a217afcda7395e909b52cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/498595
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This change updates the makeClientHello logic to only advertise TLS
1.3 ciphers when tls.Config.MinVersion is set to tls.VersionTLS13
(i.e the client only supports TLS 1.3). Previously, TLS 1.2 ciphers
would be included in the client hello message.
Fixes#57771
Change-Id: Ife4123037b0a4609578ffffb1cdf1e1d4e0a8df6
GitHub-Last-Rev: 45f4275
GitHub-Pull-Request: #49293
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/360794
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
We used to inconsistently run certificate verification on the server on
resumption, but not on the client. This made TLS 1.3 resumption pretty
much useless, as it didn't save bytes, CPU, or round-trips.
This requires serializing the verified chains into the session ticket,
so it's a tradeoff making the ticket bigger to save computation (and for
consistency).
The previous behavior also had a "stickyness" issue: if a ticket
contained invalid certificates, they would be used even if the client
had in the meantime configured valid certificates for a full handshake.
We also didn't check expiration on the client side on resumption if
InsecureSkipVerify was set. Again for consistency, we do that now.
Also, we used to run VerifyPeerCertificates on resumption even if
NoClientCerts was set.
Fixes#31641
Change-Id: Icc88269ea4adb544fa81158114aae76f3c91a15f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497895
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
All OpenSSL tests now test operation with EMS. To test a handshake
*without* EMS we need to pass -Options=-ExtendedMasterSecret which is
only available in OpenSSL 3.1, which breaks a number of other tests.
Updates #43922
Change-Id: Ib9ac79a1d03fab6bfba5fe9cd66689cff661cda7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497376
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
There was a bug in TestResumption: the first ExpiredSessionTicket was
inserting a ticket far in the future, so the second ExpiredSessionTicket
wasn't actually supposed to fail. However, there was a bug in
checkForResumption->sendSessionTicket, too: if a session was not resumed
because it was too old, its createdAt was still persisted in the next
ticket. The two bugs used to cancel each other out.
For #60105Fixes#19199
Change-Id: Ic9b2aab943dcbf0de62b8758a6195319dc286e2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496821
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Ever since session ticket key rotation was introduced in CL 9072, we've
been including a prefix in every ticket to identify what key it's
encrypted with. It's a small privacy gain, but the cost of trial
decryptions is also small, especially since the first key is probably
the most frequently used.
Also reissue tickets on every resumption so that the next connection
can't be linked to all the previous ones. Again the privacy gain is
small but the performance cost is small and it comes with a reduction in
complexity.
For #60105
Change-Id: I852f297162d2b79a3d9bf61f6171e8ce94b2537a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496817
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
When server and client have mismatch in curve preference, the server will
send HelloRetryRequest during TLSv1.3 PSK resumption. There was a bug
introduced by Go1.19.6 or later and Go1.20.1 or later, that makes the client
calculate the PSK binder hash incorrectly. Server will reject the TLS
handshake by sending alert: invalid PSK binder.
Fixes#59424
Change-Id: I2ca8948474275740a36d991c057b62a13392dbb9
GitHub-Last-Rev: 1aad9bc
GitHub-Pull-Request: #59425
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481955
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Message marshalling makes use of BytesOrPanic a lot, under the
assumption that it will never panic. This assumption was incorrect, and
specifically crafted handshakes could trigger panics. Rather than just
surgically replacing the usages of BytesOrPanic in paths that could
panic, replace all usages of it with proper error returns in case there
are other ways of triggering panics which we didn't find.
In one specific case, the tree routed by expandLabel, we replace the
usage of BytesOrPanic, but retain a panic. This function already
explicitly panicked elsewhere, and returning an error from it becomes
rather painful because it requires changing a large number of APIs.
The marshalling is unlikely to ever panic, as the inputs are all either
fixed length, or already limited to the sizes required. If it were to
panic, it'd likely only be during development. A close inspection shows
no paths for a user to cause a panic currently.
This patches ends up being rather large, since it requires routing
errors back through functions which previously had no error returns.
Where possible I've tried to use helpers that reduce the verbosity
of frequently repeated stanzas, and to make the diffs as minimal as
possible.
Thanks to Marten Seemann for reporting this issue.
Fixes#58001
Fixes CVE-2022-41724
Change-Id: Ieb55867ef0a3e1e867b33f09421932510cb58851
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1679436
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468125
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
This change makes it easier for clients to debug mutual TLS connection failures. Currently, there are a few situations where invalid client auth leads to a generic "bad certificate" alert. 3 specific situations have a more appropriate TLS alert code, based on the alert descriptions in the appendix of both RFC5246 and RFC8446.
1. The server is configured to require client auth, but no client cert was provided; the appropriate alert is "certificate required". This applies only to TLS 1.3, which first defined the certificate_required alert code.
2. The client provided a cert that was signed by an authority that is not in the server's trusted set of CAs; the appropriate alert is "unknown certificate authority".
3. The client provided an expired (or not yet valid) cert; the appropriate alert is "expired certificate".
Otherwise, we still fall back to "bad certificate".
Fixes#52113
Change-Id: I7d5860fe911cad8a1615f16bfe488a37e936dc36
GitHub-Last-Rev: 34eeab5
GitHub-Pull-Request: #53251
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/410496
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
yuhan6665