This makes three related changes that work particularly well together
and would require significant extra work to do separately: it replaces
X25519Kyber768Draft00 with X25519MLKEM768, it makes CurvePreferences
ordering crypto/tls-selected, and applies a preference to PQ key
exchange methods over key shares (to mitigate downgrades).
TestHandshakeServerUnsupportedKeyShare was removed because we are not
rejecting unsupported key shares anymore (nor do we select them, and
rejecting them actively is a MAY). It would have been nice to keep the
test to check we still continue successfully, but testClientHelloFailure
is broken in the face of any server-side behavior which requires writing
any other messages back to the client, or reading them.
Updates #69985Fixes#69393
Change-Id: I58de76f5b8742a9bd4543fd7907c48e038507b19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/630775
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Adds support for server-side ECH.
We make a couple of implementation decisions that are not completely
in-line with the spec. In particular, we don't enforce that the SNI
matches the ECHConfig public_name, and we implement a hybrid
shared/backend mode (rather than shared or split mode, as described in
Section 7). Both of these match the behavior of BoringSSL.
The hybrid server mode will either act as a shared mode server, where-in
the server accepts "outer" client hellos and unwraps them before
processing the "inner" hello, or accepts bare "inner" hellos initially.
This lets the server operate either transparently as a shared mode
server, or a backend server, in Section 7 terminology. This seems like
the best implementation choice for a TLS library.
Fixes#68500
Change-Id: Ife69db7c1886610742e95e76b0ca92587e6d7ed4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/623576
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Go 1.23 adds two new events to QUICConns: QUICStoreSessionEvent and
QUICResumeSessionEvent. We added a QUICConfig.EnableStoreSessionEvent
flag to control whether the store-session event is provided or not,
because receiving this event requires additional action from the caller:
the session must be explicitly stored with QUICConn.StoreSession.
We did not add a control for whether the resume-session event is
provided, because this event requires no action and the caller is
expected to ignore unknown events.
However, we never documented the expectation that callers ignore
unknown events, and quic-go produces an error when receiving an
unexpected event. So change the EnableStoreSessionEvent flag to
apply to both new events.
Fixes#68124
For #63691
Change-Id: I84af487e52b3815f7b648e09884608f8915cd645
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/594475
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
I initially thought the logic was broken, but writing the test I
realized it was actually very clever (derogative). It was relying on the
outer loop continuing after a supported match without a key share,
allowing a later key share to override it (but not a later supported
match because of the "if selectedGroup != 0 { continue }").
Replaced the clever loop with two hopefully more understandable loops,
and added a test (which was already passing).
We were however not checking that the selected group is in the supported
list if we found it in key shares first. (This was only a MAY.) Fixed.
Fixes#65686
Change-Id: I09ea44f90167ffa36809deb78255ed039a217b6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586655
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
We used to inconsistently run certificate verification on the server on
resumption, but not on the client. This made TLS 1.3 resumption pretty
much useless, as it didn't save bytes, CPU, or round-trips.
This requires serializing the verified chains into the session ticket,
so it's a tradeoff making the ticket bigger to save computation (and for
consistency).
The previous behavior also had a "stickyness" issue: if a ticket
contained invalid certificates, they would be used even if the client
had in the meantime configured valid certificates for a full handshake.
We also didn't check expiration on the client side on resumption if
InsecureSkipVerify was set. Again for consistency, we do that now.
Also, we used to run VerifyPeerCertificates on resumption even if
NoClientCerts was set.
Fixes#31641
Change-Id: Icc88269ea4adb544fa81158114aae76f3c91a15f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497895
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
There was a bug in TestResumption: the first ExpiredSessionTicket was
inserting a ticket far in the future, so the second ExpiredSessionTicket
wasn't actually supposed to fail. However, there was a bug in
checkForResumption->sendSessionTicket, too: if a session was not resumed
because it was too old, its createdAt was still persisted in the next
ticket. The two bugs used to cancel each other out.
For #60105Fixes#19199
Change-Id: Ic9b2aab943dcbf0de62b8758a6195319dc286e2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496821
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Ever since session ticket key rotation was introduced in CL 9072, we've
been including a prefix in every ticket to identify what key it's
encrypted with. It's a small privacy gain, but the cost of trial
decryptions is also small, especially since the first key is probably
the most frequently used.
Also reissue tickets on every resumption so that the next connection
can't be linked to all the previous ones. Again the privacy gain is
small but the performance cost is small and it comes with a reduction in
complexity.
For #60105
Change-Id: I852f297162d2b79a3d9bf61f6171e8ce94b2537a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496817
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Message marshalling makes use of BytesOrPanic a lot, under the
assumption that it will never panic. This assumption was incorrect, and
specifically crafted handshakes could trigger panics. Rather than just
surgically replacing the usages of BytesOrPanic in paths that could
panic, replace all usages of it with proper error returns in case there
are other ways of triggering panics which we didn't find.
In one specific case, the tree routed by expandLabel, we replace the
usage of BytesOrPanic, but retain a panic. This function already
explicitly panicked elsewhere, and returning an error from it becomes
rather painful because it requires changing a large number of APIs.
The marshalling is unlikely to ever panic, as the inputs are all either
fixed length, or already limited to the sizes required. If it were to
panic, it'd likely only be during development. A close inspection shows
no paths for a user to cause a panic currently.
This patches ends up being rather large, since it requires routing
errors back through functions which previously had no error returns.
Where possible I've tried to use helpers that reduce the verbosity
of frequently repeated stanzas, and to make the diffs as minimal as
possible.
Thanks to Marten Seemann for reporting this issue.
Fixes#58001
Fixes CVE-2022-41724
Change-Id: Ieb55867ef0a3e1e867b33f09421932510cb58851
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1679436
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468125
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
yuhan6665