If a ClientHello only supports TLS 1.3, or if a CertificateRequest is
sent after selecting TLS 1.3, we should not advertise TLS 1.2-only
signature_algorithms like PKCS#1 v1.5 or SHA-1.
However, since crypto/x509 still supports PKCS#1 v1.5, and a direct
CertPool match might not care about the signature in the certificate at
all, start sending a separate signature_algorithms_cert extension to
indicate support for PKCS#1 v1.5 and SHA-1 in certificates.
We were already correctly rejecting these algorithms if the peer
selected them in a TLS 1.3 connection.
Updates #72883
Change-Id: I6a6a4656ab60e1b7fb20fdedc32604dc156953ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/658215
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Uses the new weak package to replace the existing custom intern cache
with a map of weak.Pointers instead. This simplifies the cache, and
means we don't need to store a slice of handles on the Conn anymore.
Change-Id: I5c2bf6ef35fac4255e140e184f4e48574b34174c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/644176
TryBot-Bypass: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Unlike in earlier TLS versions, in TLS 1.3 when processing a server
hello the legacy_compression_method MUST have the value 0. It is no
longer a parameter that offers a choice of compression method.
With this in mind, it seems more appropriate to return a decode error
when we encounter a non-zero compression method in a server hello
message. We haven't found a parameter value we reject, we've found
a message that doesn't decode according to its specification.
Making this change also aligns with BoringSSL and allows enabling the
TLS13-HRR-InvalidCompressionMethod bogo test.
Updates #72006
Change-Id: I27a2cd231e4b8762b0d9e2dbd3d8ddd5b87fd5c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/669156
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
When ECH is rejected, properly take retry configs from the encrypted
extensions message. Also fix the bogo shim to properly test for this
behavior.
We should properly map the full BoringSSL -> Go errors so that we don't
run into a similar failure in the future, but this is left for a follow
up CL.
Fixes#70915
Change-Id: Icc1878ff6f87df059e7b83e0a431f50f1fea833c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/638583
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This makes three related changes that work particularly well together
and would require significant extra work to do separately: it replaces
X25519Kyber768Draft00 with X25519MLKEM768, it makes CurvePreferences
ordering crypto/tls-selected, and applies a preference to PQ key
exchange methods over key shares (to mitigate downgrades).
TestHandshakeServerUnsupportedKeyShare was removed because we are not
rejecting unsupported key shares anymore (nor do we select them, and
rejecting them actively is a MAY). It would have been nice to keep the
test to check we still continue successfully, but testClientHelloFailure
is broken in the face of any server-side behavior which requires writing
any other messages back to the client, or reading them.
Updates #69985Fixes#69393
Change-Id: I58de76f5b8742a9bd4543fd7907c48e038507b19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/630775
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Adds support for server-side ECH.
We make a couple of implementation decisions that are not completely
in-line with the spec. In particular, we don't enforce that the SNI
matches the ECHConfig public_name, and we implement a hybrid
shared/backend mode (rather than shared or split mode, as described in
Section 7). Both of these match the behavior of BoringSSL.
The hybrid server mode will either act as a shared mode server, where-in
the server accepts "outer" client hellos and unwraps them before
processing the "inner" hello, or accepts bare "inner" hellos initially.
This lets the server operate either transparently as a shared mode
server, or a backend server, in Section 7 terminology. This seems like
the best implementation choice for a TLS library.
Fixes#68500
Change-Id: Ife69db7c1886610742e95e76b0ca92587e6d7ed4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/623576
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Go 1.23 adds two new events to QUICConns: QUICStoreSessionEvent and
QUICResumeSessionEvent. We added a QUICConfig.EnableStoreSessionEvent
flag to control whether the store-session event is provided or not,
because receiving this event requires additional action from the caller:
the session must be explicitly stored with QUICConn.StoreSession.
We did not add a control for whether the resume-session event is
provided, because this event requires no action and the caller is
expected to ignore unknown events.
However, we never documented the expectation that callers ignore
unknown events, and quic-go produces an error when receiving an
unexpected event. So change the EnableStoreSessionEvent flag to
apply to both new events.
Fixes#68124
For #63691
Change-Id: I84af487e52b3815f7b648e09884608f8915cd645
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/594475
Reviewed-by: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
This CL adds a (very opinionated) client-side ECH implementation.
In particular, if a user configures a ECHConfigList, by setting the
Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList, but we determine that none of
the configs are appropriate, we will not fallback to plaintext SNI, and
will instead return an error. It is then up to the user to decide if
they wish to fallback to plaintext themselves (by removing the config
list).
Additionally if Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList is provided, we
will not offer TLS support lower than 1.3, since negotiating any other
version, while offering ECH, is a hard error anyway. Similarly, if a
user wishes to fallback to plaintext SNI by using 1.2, they may do so
by removing the config list.
With regard to PSK GREASE, we match the boringssl behavior, which does
not include PSK identities/binders in the outer hello when doing ECH.
If the server rejects ECH, we will return a ECHRejectionError error,
which, if provided by the server, will contain a ECHConfigList in the
RetryConfigList field containing configs that should be used if the user
wishes to retry. It is up to the user to replace their existing
Config.EncryptedClientHelloConfigList with the retry config list.
Fixes#63369
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: I9bc373c044064221a647a388ac61624efd6bbdbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/578575
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
I initially thought the logic was broken, but writing the test I
realized it was actually very clever (derogative). It was relying on the
outer loop continuing after a supported match without a key share,
allowing a later key share to override it (but not a later supported
match because of the "if selectedGroup != 0 { continue }").
Replaced the clever loop with two hopefully more understandable loops,
and added a test (which was already passing).
We were however not checking that the selected group is in the supported
list if we found it in key shares first. (This was only a MAY.) Fixed.
Fixes#65686
Change-Id: I09ea44f90167ffa36809deb78255ed039a217b6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/586655
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
All OpenSSL tests now test operation with EMS. To test a handshake
*without* EMS we need to pass -Options=-ExtendedMasterSecret which is
only available in OpenSSL 3.1, which breaks a number of other tests.
Updates #43922
Change-Id: Ib9ac79a1d03fab6bfba5fe9cd66689cff661cda7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497376
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
When server and client have mismatch in curve preference, the server will
send HelloRetryRequest during TLSv1.3 PSK resumption. There was a bug
introduced by Go1.19.6 or later and Go1.20.1 or later, that makes the client
calculate the PSK binder hash incorrectly. Server will reject the TLS
handshake by sending alert: invalid PSK binder.
Fixes#59424
Change-Id: I2ca8948474275740a36d991c057b62a13392dbb9
GitHub-Last-Rev: 1aad9bc
GitHub-Pull-Request: #59425
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/481955
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Message marshalling makes use of BytesOrPanic a lot, under the
assumption that it will never panic. This assumption was incorrect, and
specifically crafted handshakes could trigger panics. Rather than just
surgically replacing the usages of BytesOrPanic in paths that could
panic, replace all usages of it with proper error returns in case there
are other ways of triggering panics which we didn't find.
In one specific case, the tree routed by expandLabel, we replace the
usage of BytesOrPanic, but retain a panic. This function already
explicitly panicked elsewhere, and returning an error from it becomes
rather painful because it requires changing a large number of APIs.
The marshalling is unlikely to ever panic, as the inputs are all either
fixed length, or already limited to the sizes required. If it were to
panic, it'd likely only be during development. A close inspection shows
no paths for a user to cause a panic currently.
This patches ends up being rather large, since it requires routing
errors back through functions which previously had no error returns.
Where possible I've tried to use helpers that reduce the verbosity
of frequently repeated stanzas, and to make the diffs as minimal as
possible.
Thanks to Marten Seemann for reporting this issue.
Fixes#58001
Fixes CVE-2022-41724
Change-Id: Ieb55867ef0a3e1e867b33f09421932510cb58851
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1679436
Reviewed-by: Julie Qiu <julieqiu@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Security TryBots <security-trybots@go-security-trybots.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <bracewell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/468125
Run-TryBot: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
yuhan6665