mirror of
https://github.com/LorenEteval/Furious.git
synced 2026-09-22 23:08:08 +03:00
4.2 KiB
4.2 KiB
Release workflow guidance
Inherit repository-wide rules from the root AGENTS.md. This scope owns build/publication evidence and target-specific
exceptions; it does not define the source test suite or imply that every package dependency is pinned.
Publication and matrix contract
workflows/deploy-pypi.ymlis both packaging coverage and the publication graph. Pull requests and ordinary pushes build artifacts; tag pushes additionally publish Python distributions, create the GitHub release, and enable the dependent WinGet flow. Preserve permission, secret, environment,if, andneedsboundaries.workflows/daily-matrix-build.ymlowns the shared binary matrix, called byworkflows/deploy-pypi.ymland also run daily or manually. Its standalone runs build, verify, and upload artifacts with read-only repository permissions; publication remains inworkflows/deploy-pypi.yml.- Treat each matrix row as a supported product target with explicit runner OS/architecture, Python, Qt/PySide source,
native-binding toolchain, compatibility floor,
Deploy.pyoutput, and upload pattern. Artifact names and architecture checks must agree; never infer target architecture from the host label alone. - Current target-specific assertions are intentional: Linux proves an Essentials-only/no-WebEngine application and its Flatpak sandbox dependencies; macOS verifies its WebEngine frameworks, helpers, resources, relocation, and signing; Windows verifies native imports and every packaged PE machine type, with a separate Windows 7 compatibility toolchain. Change an exception only with evidence from the affected target. Binary jobs filter shared requirements before installing target-specific Qt/native bindings; copying the ordinary package dependency list into those jobs can reintroduce Addons on Linux or replace a compatibility build. Review the effective installed set, not just the checked-in requirements.
Workflow engineering
- Keep packaging declarations synchronized with
Deploy.py,pyproject.toml,setup.py, andrequirements.txt. The Python floor advertised by package metadata is a separate claim from the interpreter versions exercised by CI; newer matrix rows cannot prove that floor. Likewise, successful Qt imports do not prove event-loop or binding-call compatibility. Default-to-newest dependencies/assets still need recorded provenance and deterministic assertions at ABI/feature boundaries; pin or checksum external build tools where the workflow establishes that boundary. - The workflow default shell is Bash, including Windows jobs. Select PowerShell explicitly for native Windows paths, process APIs, or PowerShell syntax, and keep OS/architecture conditions on the step that owns the difference.
- Flatpak checks run inside the installed sandbox, inspect the application's required native closure rather than every unused Qt plugin, and fail before upload. Do not mask an actually loadable plugin/runtime mismatch with a broad allowlist.
- Generated helper files, downloaded SDKs/assets, build directories, and local bundles are disposable workflow inputs; do not commit them. Never expose credentials or enable publication from untrusted pull-request code.
Verification
- Validate YAML and every affected expression/shell. Trace each changed matrix row through dependency installation, source/native import checks, Nuitka/installer output, packaged architecture/dependency checks, artifact upload, and tag gates. When a target cannot run locally, add a narrow CI assertion that fails before publication with a useful reason.
- The current workflow performs packaging/import/native checks but does not run the unittest behavioral suite. Do
not call an artifact build a regression-test pass; use
tests/README.mdfor source verification. Check actualneedsand tag gates rather than assuming a downstream publish job runs on every build. Follow each publication dependency back to its required artifact checks; upload success alone does not establish release eligibility. - Revalidate version/architecture claims against the current matrix instead of duplicating all pins here. When build topology intentionally changes, update this scope and follow every consumer through upload and publication.